CATEGORIES
The following five categories will be used as divisions
for the 11th International Sake Challenge.
Daiginjo-shu & Ginjo-shu
Junmai Daiginjo-shu
Junmai Ginjo-shu
Junmai-shu
Kimoto and Yamahai types (of all grades)
The honjozo classification, while a valid class of premium sake,
has not been included for two reasons. One is to streamline the
judging of the entries, the other is that it resides at the low
end of the premium sake range, and accordingly is not as popular
amongst consumers and potential overseas customers.
The reasoning for the kimoto/yamahai classification is that the
usually distinct style of these types would potentially make them
so drastically different from most of the other sake that a direct
comparison would be difficult at best; it would be goranges and
apples.h
Admittedly, there are kimoto/yamahai products that are not as bold
as most, but note that brewers are free to submit such products
into the other categories, and are not obligated to submit them
in the kimoto/yamahai division. As such, this classification would
likely contain sake that are distinctive in their representation
of the idiosyncrasies of the yamahai/kimoto styles.
Ginjo and Junmai Ginjo (as well as Daiginjo and Junmai Daginjo)
present flavor profiles that are, in a general sense, different
enough to validate separate categories. Furthermore, attitudes and
philosophies amongst the judges toward these grades may vary from
person to person.
GLASSWARE
A key to the validity and credibility of the event will be that
high level wine tasters will be assessing sake side by side with
high level sake tasting professionals. Yet these two groups will
likely have their preferences and comfort zones related to tasting
glassware.
What should be avoided at all costs is a situation in which a taster,
either Japanese or otherwise, felt that the importance, validity
or credibility of the event was adversely affected by the choice
of glassware. It would be a shame if a Japanese judge were to say,
gI was just not comfortable tasting sake from a wine glass,h or
alternatively having an international wine judge comment along the
lines of gHow can they really assess such fine premium sake from
a straight-sided tumbler and not a tulip-shaped glass?h All judges
need to walk away feeling they were equipped well enough to do their
best and be satisfied with the results.
Furthermore, it seems appropriate to allow the international judges
to experience and enjoy judging sake in the same way it is normally
done by Japanese judges in Japan.
As such, the sake bottles to be tasted will be lined up along the
edge of a table with a standard 180 ml "kiki-choko" official
tasting glass set in front of it. All judges will taste and score
at their own pace from this glass. However, standard wine glasses
will also be made available for those judges that may be more comfortable
with that option. Judges will be free to use either. Riedel daiginjo
glasses will be offered in place of the wine glass, but for diaginjo
classes only.
The above will ensure thoroughness and a high level of comfort
for all judges.
AWARDS
Gold, Silver, Bronze Medals and Seal of Approval
All Sakes entered are tasted by the judges as well as by the Co-Chairmen
to ensure that no Sake is overlooked or unfairly assessed. A Sake
will win a Gold Medal if it reaches a score of at least 18.5 out
of 20; a Silver Medal if the score is between 17 and 18.4; a Bronze
Medal if the score is between 15.5 and 16.9; and a Seal of Approval
if the score is between 14.5 and 15.4.
Trophy Awards
In addition to the above medals, and if in the opinion of the judges
the Sake so merits, the top Gold Medal-winning Sake in each of the
6 categories will be eligible to receive a Trophy Award. These are
decided by the judges after ranking the Gold Medals in the following
Trophy Categories:
Trophy for Best Daiginjyo/Ginjyo
Trophy for Best Junmai Daiginjyo
Trophy for Best Junmai Ginjyo
Trophy for Best Junmai
Trophy for Best Aged Sake
|